Skip to content

MA Question 2 Gains Another $1.5 Million, Mostly from NY

September 21, 2016

Massachusetts has four ballot questions up for vote on November 8th: Expand gaming (Q1); raise charter school cap (Q2); prevent cruelty to farm animals (Q3), and regulate and tax marijuana (Q4).

In support of Q1, the Horse Racing Jobs and Education Committee has raised $431,370 as of the September 20th filing. No committee has raised any money in opposition.

Q3 (preventing cruelty to farm animals) also has only supporters, Citizens for Farm Animal Protection, which has raised $1.7 million.

And Q4, on the legalization and regulation of marijuana, has supporters, Yes on 4, who have raised $2.9 million, as well as three opposing ballot committees (Safe Cannabis Massachusetts, Smart Approaches to Marijuana Action, and the Campaign for a Safe and Healthy Massachusetts), which have raised a combined total of $451,017, as of September 20th.

But it is Q2, on the expanding of charter schools, which has been the real money draw. As of the September 09, 2016, filing, four committees in support of Q2 had raised a combined $11 million (taking into account that two of these committees shuffled $1 million to the two other committees), and one committee in opposition had raised $6.8 million.

On September 20,2016, one committee in support of Q2, Great Schools MA, has added another $1,029,193— with most of it– $1 million– coming from the largest funder by far of Massachusetts’ ballot measure for charter expansion: New York-based lobbying nonprofit, Families for Excellent Schools Advocacy.

What this means is that as of September 20, 2016, the New York-based lobbying nonprofit has spent $6,750,000 to expand charters in Massachusetts.

Also, as of September 20, 2016, the total amount of unique, non-overlapping money spent in support of Q2 is $12.1 million. New York-based Families for Excellent Schools Advocacy has provided 56 percent of that total.

The September 20th reporting also includes an additional $413,192 in support to the sole committee opposing Q2, Save Our Public Schools. Of that amount, $406,324 comes from Boston-based AFT Massachusetts. None of the $413,192 comes from an out-of-state individual or organization.

The grand total spent on Q2 as of September 20th is $19.3 million– over 5.5 times the amount of money spent to date on the question of legalizing marijuana in Massachusetts– and more than 3.5 times the money spent on the other three ballot measures combined.

On its 2014 tax form, Families for Excellent Schools Advocacy (FES-A) states its mission as “works to build coalitions and run campaigns that change education policy.”

Note that the statement above does not say “in New York.”

FES-A spent $1.8 million to do so from July 2014 to June 2015.

Now, in 2016, it has already spent four times as much to “run the campaign to change education policy” in Massachusetts.

And the Q2 spending isn’t over yet.

money in safe

____________________________________________________________

Released July 2016– Book Three:

School Choice: The End of Public Education? 

school choice cover  (Click image to enlarge)

Schneider is a southern Louisiana native, career teacher, trained researcher, and author of both A Chronicle of Echoes: Who’s Who In the Implosion of American Public Education and Common Core Dilemma: Who Owns Our Schools?.

both books

Don’t care to buy from Amazon? Purchase my books from Powell’s City of Books instead.

7 Comments
  1. stiegem permalink

    I am kind of thinking that we just have to watch them spend. Is there a solution to this problem (because it is a problem)? Solution? Many variables. Shall we vote to resolve the problem? Is that the answer. No. “There are no answers. Only questions.” Great quote from the Russian film maker of “Solaris”. Also what Steven Hawkins states. (Sigh).

  2. Jill Reifschneider permalink

    Just think if we spent that kind of money in our public schools! Thank you for revealing the money behind the campaign ads and propaganda. This is truly scary. It is extremely difficult to attempt to explain why lifting the cap and expanding enrollment is not a healthy choice for public education when the message is clearly the opposite. I have had several conversations with voters here in Massachusetts who are confused and do not see the problem. I am struggling to piece together a clear, concise letter to my local paper that explains the problem in less than 500 words. I feel like we are being slowly, but surely, dragged off a cliff. Thank you for exposing the scam while we work to prevent it from becoming a reality here on the ground.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Why Massachusetts Voters Should Think Twice About Charter Expansion | deutsch29
  2. Mercedes Schneider: More New York Millions Arrive in Massachusetts to Sway Voters on Charters | Diane Ravitch's blog
  3. Ed News, Tuesday, September 27, 2016 Edition | tigersteach
  4. Massachusetts Charter School Vote Attracts National Dark Money - Non Profit News For Nonprofit Organizations | Nonprofit Quarterly
  5. Massachusetts Charter School Vote Attracts National Dark Money – THE DD LEARNING CENTER FOR NON PROFITS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: